Added: Nov 8, 2009
From: ddchalmers
Duration: 3:53
Energy security + how to get rid of the electricity grid! LOL. A Melbourne company has been developing a cleaner electricity for Australians which could be implemented as early as next year..... but, as with solar thermal technology, will most probably be marketed everywhere else in the world first, uhh..... Traditional electricity generation is inherently wasteful. More than half the energy content of the fuel escapes from the power station's cooling tower as waste heat. In addition, more than 5% of the electricity generated is lost in transmission in the journey from grid to end user. An alternative approach is to generate electricity within homes and commercial buildings using a device called a fuel cell essentially a large battery with a replenishable fuel source. In Manchester, Mike Mason advocated fuel cells that use solid-oxide technology. These can run on natural gas, ethanol or various other fuels, including the gases produced when making biochar. Mason described domestic fuel cells that can produce electricity from gas more efficiently than even the best modern power stations and at a lower cost. As a bonus, because the generation happens at the point of consumption, transmission losses are minimised and any heat created can be used for hot water and radiators..... http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jul/13/manchester-report-fuel-cells Ceramic Fuel Cells opens Germany plant - Melbourne-based alternative energy company Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd (CFC) has opened its large-scale fuel cell manufacturing plant in Germany. CFC is developing solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology to provide energy efficient and low-emission electricity from natural gas and renewable fuels. The company is currently making fuel cell "modules", which appliance companies can integrate into various product. The first products to be powered by the company's fuel cells will be compact generators for homes and other buildings that produce low-emission power as well as heat for hot water or space heating. "These product will meet the growing need for energy whilst also reducing greenhouse gas emissions....." http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-business/ceramic-fuel-cells-opens-germany-plant-20091005-giei.html Ceramic fires up Bluegen - October 5, 2009 - THE ASX-listed alternative energy company Ceramic Fuel Cells is set to start making its ''Bluegen'' home solid oxide fuel cell units, which could see them being installed in Australian homes from early next year. Manufactured in Germany, the units will be priced from $8000 to $10,000 each and produce up to 17,000 kwh of electricity a year - more than twice the amount needed to power an average home. Ceramic's managing director, Brendan Dow, said the grid-connected units, which are about the size of a dishwasher, generate electricity from natural gas on-site at a higher efficiency and lower cost than coal-fired power. Mr Dow said the units operated silently, did not use hydrogen and were safe to install in homes. By February he hoped they would be certified as a safe gas appliance. A key to the take-up of the units in Australia would be qualifying for Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), which would give utilities an incentive to install them, he added. "It's difficult to get utilities really interested in Australia under the current climate," Mr Dow said..... http://www.theage.com.au/business/ceramic-fires-up-bluegen-20091004-ghv7.html Ceramic Fuel Cells Limited - Australian company engaging the stationary power market with a solid oxide fuel cell design..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta7RpOwQYbk
Channel: Tech
Rating: 5.0' max='5' min='1' numRaters='6' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#overall ( ratings) Views: 5199 Comments: 32
dancaldwell230 Says:
Jul 21, 2010 - I belive Hydrogen is the cleanest fuel avail.
ronmann606 Says:
Jul 26, 2010 - @toyboyinaussie It wouldn't be efficient to compress natural gas to thousands of psi to store it in heavy steel bottles, convert it to electricity with these fuel cells, store that energy in a large battery or ultracaps that has enough max current discharge to drive an electric motor powerful enough to move a 5000+ lbs car.
ronmann606 Says:
Jul 26, 2010 - This could take over. Imagine if you were to build a city from scratch today. You could eliminate electricity generating stations and power lines with this technology.
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 2, 2010 - @ronmann606 It's efficient enough that companies like google and ebay have bought bloom boxes, and are saving money doing so. If you think that large batteries and ultracaps are the only viable ways to store energy, you need a better education
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 3, 2010 - @getsafe1212 Just to clarify we were talking about using these in cars. Did google and ebay put these in their cars? Why are you putting down my education?
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 3, 2010 - @ronmann606 I agree that cars are not on the top of the list of fuel cell applications. However, you said "It wouldn't be efficient to compress natural gas to thousands of psi to store it in heavy steel bottles, convert it to electricity with these fuel cells, store that energy in a large battery or ultracaps that has enough max current discharge to drive an electric motor powerful enough to move a 5000+ lbs car."
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 3, 2010 - @getsafe1212 1) Conventional internal combustion engines have been used in public buses for years, storing enough on a vehicle isn't a crippling issue. 2) Pressure vessels can be built from light weight materials like carbon fiber 3) Electricity production using fuel cells can be extremely efficient, at least double that of an ICE 4) Batteries do not need to provide max power. Super-capacitors are used in conjunction with batteries/fuel cells to provide short periods of rapid acceleration
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 3, 2010 - @getsafe1212 Google, Ebay and Walmart have solid oxide fuel cell stacks outside their headquarters. Considering the price of natural gas, and efficiency of fuel cells, they are saving money compared to buying electricity from the grid. I questioned your education because you don't believe an electric car (battery or fuel cell) can be built, and be economically viable. They can be and have been, you're statements are plainly false.
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 3, 2010 - @getsafe1212 I should add that super capacitors are also very efficient, I didn't recognize what you meant by ultra caps initially
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 4, 2010 - @getsafe1212 "I questioned your education because you don't believe an electric car (battery or fuel cell) can be built" I never said that nor implied it, that would be a ridiculous and completely false comment, try to quote me, I said nothing even close to that.
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 4, 2010 - @getsafe1212 Your suggesting that using carbon fiber storage bottles, a 25KW+ fuel cell, batteries and ultra caps and an electric motor with a controller can be cost competitive with gas or battery electric cars? What about the large amounts of energy used to compress the gas, none of that is recoverable unless you add a pneumatic engine, alternator and some electronics. This sounds like a good competitor for hydrogen cars lol
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 5, 2010 - @ronmann606 "It wouldn't be efficient to compress natural gas to thousands of psi to store it in heavy steel bottles, convert it to electricity with these fuel cells, store that energy in a large battery or ultracaps that has enough max current discharge to drive an electric motor powerful enough to move a 5000+ lbs car.." The you said ""I questioned your education because you don't believe an electric car (battery or fuel cell) can be built" I never said that nor implied it."
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 5, 2010 - @getsafe1212 I should have said you don't believe it's economically viable. This is not true
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 5, 2010 - @getsafe1212 Although 25 kW is not required continuously
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 5, 2010 - @getsafe1212 By the way, a 17 kg Li-ion battery can provide 25 kW. Is that too heavy for a car? LOL
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 6, 2010 - Correction: @ronmann606 Like I said, cars are not the best application for fuel cells. Batteries can provide 25 kW no problem
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 6, 2010 - @getsafe1212 "25 kW is not required continuously" Since your special, I'll clarify for you: To drive your conceptual natural gas, fuel cell, battery and super capacitor car as suggested by you, on the highway you will need roughly 25 KW continuously based on 385 Wh/mile@65mph. Considering GM decided they need a 53KW genset to drive a car continuously and have some headroom for spirited driving, I think my estimate was low if anything. Go to the EV Album website to see common Wh/mile.
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 6, 2010 - @getsafe1212 "By the way, a 17 kg Li-ion battery can provide 25 kW. Is that too heavy for a car?" A 1 Kg Maxwell capacitor can deliver 25KW, whats your point? I don't see how peak battery output relates to continuous fuel cell output of your concept car.
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 6, 2010 - @ronmann606 I told you fuel cell cars are not a great application. The VW bug was 80 HP at peak output, which is about 23 kW, and it drove around just fine. You're point was that batteries can't provide that kind of power. 25 kW = 17 kg of li-ion batteries. Therefore 100 kg is adequate, no problem
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 7, 2010 - @getsafe1212 80hp =60KW not 23 (thats with 100% efficiency too. I never made a point that batteries can't provide the power, no idea where you got that from. I'm done here good chat though
getsafe1212 Says:
Aug 7, 2010 - @ronmann606 You're right, I messed up the conversion. One last question, you're aware of the EV, and the tesla cars, how is it you don't think a battery car can be built? The tesla car hits 250 kW during acceleration (granted that's probably mostly from capacitors), but my main point of contention with you is that you don't seem to think it's possible. I'm confused by your stance
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 8, 2010 - @getsafe1212 Tesla doesn't use capacitors to deliver energy, only batteries. My stance on electric cars is that they are very viable and I can't believe how long its taking for them to be mainstream. NanoSafe lithiums can recharge in 5 minutes. Even if the range is only 150 km, if the infrastructure for fast charging existed there would be no reason to buy an ICE car. The only thing I suggested wasn't practical was the natural gas fuel cell car you suggested.
ronmann606 Says:
Aug 8, 2010 - @getsafe1212 BTW the whole reason I watched this vid, is because I work in the compressed natural gas industry for cars, buses and trucks. The whole thing is impractical, and it only exists because there are government substitutes. I don't believe it reduces pollution once you consider the amount of electricity and oil the compressors use to store the gas at 3600psi.
ddchalmers Says:
Sep 6, 2010 - I dunno YU removed yr comment, @dzlk78, Given tat da state of Victoria in Australia now faces a hugely expensive problem of replacing all of their old rural power transmission lines - mainly with underground 1s - to prevent repeat bushfire disasters, dis cld Bcom 1 of da best alternative solutions of all!
. . . . . . . because these video appear directly from youtube.com which we cannot control it.)
toyboyinaussie Says:
Jul 15, 2010 - I wonder if these could be built into electric cars, have natural gas tank built in to drive the ceramic generator and the electricity produced used to drive the motor. Natural gas being the cleanest fuel available it should help reduce polution.